Questions about the future are endless.

The answers - are based on the past and present.



--If a person is not forced to work, then he may not work at all?

--Will it happen that entire industries (sub-sectors) will be left without labor?

--Is it possible to carry out reform not in a large metropolis, but in a village?

--Will it all end in a social rebellion, a coup, a revolution?

--If a flow of new labor force pours into the country, where will they live?

        --What will a “mobile city” look like?

--Why can't this reform be carried out in some developed country, for example, in Russia?

--Should we accept everyone who wants to move to the country?

--How many years will it take to implement the reform?

--Is the birth of a new civilization in a politically and economically “backward” region scientifically impossible?





If a person is not forced to work, then he may not work at all?




If a person is given the opportunity to do what he wants, then he will do it

NOBODY wants to do nothing.


IPU is something that the social environment rewards, but it also forces (much stronger than money).







During the transition period, labor is redistributed among sectors of the economy “as it wishes.” Will it happen that entire industries (sub-sectors) will be left without labor?


According to the Theory of Probability, 75% of people will continue to do what they did before (: people are inert and lazy),

and critical processes start at 67%.

To neutralize the “hole” of 25%, financial and organizational (operational managers) reserves will be required.

This is why the government needs to have a reserve of money.

If you prepare in advance to neutralize the “holes” in the workforce, the problem will drop to 16%, which will require government efforts, but not the utmost.






Is it possible to carry out reform not in a large metropolis, but in a village?



The smaller the society, the more difficult and longer the reform will be.

For example, in a country with a population of 100,000 people and five sectors of the economy, another 100,000 people (with their families) came to “paradise” over the course of a year. The new workforce knows how to do what is being done in, for example, 10 sectors of the economy.

Then 50,000 people will not be able to work where they “really want”, then they will have to be “fed” until the economy “gives birth” to 5 more industries. This = expensive and reduces social enthusiasm - the main driver of reform. Bottom line = more expensive, longer and less fun. But probably.






Will it all end in a social rebellion, a coup, a revolution?


Have you ever heard of happy people somewhere rebelling?







If a flow of new labor force pours into the country, where will they live?


In mobile housing of a new type. Why exactly?

1) so as not to replace the reform with many years of preparation for it (and building housing for at least 25,000 families will take years);

2) so that during the period of formation of the new, the process of redistribution of labor does not slow down the rate of formation of the new

: the issue of changing housing is one of the most inert in people’s lives, which entails a loss of time and enthusiasm, and such losses on a large scale will significantly slow down the effect of the reform.


What will a “mobile city” look like? This is a “technical” question, that is, one that can be decided beforehand. (Although we have specific considerations on this topic).


At a glance, a “mobile city” is seen as follows:

        in the center - consumption infrastructure;

        around the center - housing;

        in the outer circle - production, -

some economic "ancient Greek" polis, cluster.

Such clusters are scattered according to the honeycomb principle: each neighbor has three neighbors.

But it is also possible to build according to a “linear” principle: stripes are “added” to the existing urban infrastructure: consumption infrastructure + housing + production.

This is a question for narrower specialists, but personally it seems to me that the cluster option is more universal.






Why can't this reform be carried out in some developed country, for example, in Russia?


And in Russia, and in the USA, and in Sweden, and in Switzerland, and in other “developed” countries they will refuse. The reason is as follows:

The West and the East are intensely preparing for war, so every month is important for them. And the reform will lead to a temporary slowdown of the economy for at least a year. And this is unacceptable to the real rulers, neither East nor West.






Should we accept everyone who wants to move to the country?



No: the lack of diversified development of the country will lead to the need

long time

waste resources (and time)

for the maintenance of the masses of people, which is practically useless for reform.

The government must develop a plan for the desired specialties * at the preparation stage of the reform.

And as the economy develops, expand this list.


Principal feature:

If a person wanted to come “to heaven”, then

it is necessary that all his thoughts be only in “paradise”.


Family is the direction of a person’s thoughts, which can occupy up to 50% of his will.


Therefore, the list of desired specialties should imply that the entire family of a person is allowed to enter, as well as those with whom the connection will be recognized as integral: parents, relatives, associates, etc.

(This will pay off multiple times, including due to the fact that

such a rule for people is!much better than what they expected,

which will “automatically” increase the dedication of those accepted

for at least a year,

and the first year of reforms is decisive).







How many years will it take to implement the reform?


Term is determined by speed, and speed is determined by acceleration.

If you work with “acceleration” tools, the period will be minimal;

if - with “speed” tools, then acceptable with reservations;

if - with the tools of deadlines, then the reform will never be realized.


But, if the car starts moving with “mad” acceleration, the car will be damaged. Therefore there is a contradiction:

the faster, the lower the costs,

but if we do it right away, very quickly, then we won’t move at all.


The process of gaining speed must be made as smooth as possible.

This does not require a careful calculation of the future (which is theoretically impossible),

and use "Dynamic scheduling" 20240226002754.





                        20240225234955 Reform management. Who and how

                        20240226002754 Frequently asked questions and answers




        Dynamic reform plan

        (Dynamic scheduling)



A dynamic plan differs from a static (generally accepted) plan in that

the task is not to describe the future down to the “screw”,

and the task is to move forward

with simultaneous CONTINUOUS adjustment of movement plans.


In other words:

start with solving the main tasks of the “first line”

in the process of solving them, find and refine the technology for solving the main problems of the “second line”

and so on until the last “line” of tasks.

After the “next line” is 2/3 solved,

        it is necessary to direct the main forces to the “second line”,

        and leave 1/3 on the first one.



        Organizationally, the “first line” of tasks is formed as follows:


Group Sh proposes to the Government (Group A) and the Sheikh (Commander-in-Chief) a Strategic Plan (interspersed with Tactical and Operational)

        to raise all questions and doubts;

the received material is being processed

        to develop solutions for each position;

material is included in the Strategic Plan,

which is then used as the Work Plan.

There is no second round of polling.


during its implementation

stakeholders have new considerations

they are being worked on by group Sh

and are included in the Current Work Plan.


This is repeated until the reform is implemented.


That is, in the future the plan ALWAYS represents:

        a detailed action plan for “today”;

        tentative plan for "tomorrow";

        contour plan for "the day after tomorrow".




20240225234954 Beginning of section
















===================================================== ===============


Is the birth of a new civilization in a politically and economically “backward” region scientifically impossible?




Practice shows that science, to put it mildly, knows little about civilizational issues.


        Example No. 1.


The revolution in Tsarist Russia and the subsequent change in the method of production clearly proves this.



“According to science,” coming to power could be achieved in the country where

the professional proletariat (working class) forms the basis of the working population,

and where it would be strongly organized politically.


By that time, such a country was, for example, Germany. Number of workers:


Germany         large cities (42)        > 2 million       = 3% of population 65 M

                        all cities                   > 20 million     ≈ 1/3

Russia              large cities (19)        ≈ 0.5 million    = 0.3% of population 171 M

                        all cities (1913)        ≈ 3 million       ≈ 1.7%


That is, the mass of the organized proletariat

in Russia was less than in Germany


        !! time




Determined by the presence of a leading party,

its quantitative and qualitative composition.



In Russia before the revolution (February 1917) there were 10 thousand party members (Bolsheviks) = 0.006%

in Germany (1912) there were ≈ 1 million = 1.5% members of the Social Democratic Party

RESULT = in Russia the party was numerically weaker than its German counterpart at 256!! once


                                       HOWEVER !


History decreed that the revolution took place not in Germany, but in the “wrong” Russia.


Second example.


The "smart" West planned a war against the USSR in the mid-20th century.

Thousands of the smartest people, the entire leadership of the West, prepared and decided.

How did it end?

The West lost half of Europe and Asia, the world colonial order fell apart, and it became dangerous to use naked force.

This is direct evidence of the “blindness” of civilizational science.


The civilization of the so-called “West” - globalizing capitalism - appeared only half a thousand years ago.

Today the world is completely globalized. The soil for further growth of Western civilization has dried up.

World authorities in the study of civilizational patterns, including: N. Danilevsky, O. Spengler and A. Toynbee) argued that

[1] "all civilizations go through the same one-variant "organic" cycle: they are born, develop, and ultimately disintegrate and die. The end to which the "Western" model has come is characterized as "the fundamental problem of the West, which consists in the gap between 'Spirituality and soulless materialism"

This finish line at the end of 2023 and 2024 was voiced by the top officials of “Western” civilization:


2023, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken. [2]

"What we are experiencing now is more than a test of the strength of the world order that emerged after the Cold War. It is the end of it."


2023, US President - Biden. [3]

"We spent 50 years in the post-war period where it worked pretty damn well, but now the steam has kind of run out. The steam has kind of run out. We need a new, new world order."


2024, EU - High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy J. Borrell. [4]+[5]

"The era of Western dominance is finally over."


2024, UN Secretary General - Guterres. [6]

"Our world has entered an era of chaos

..potential areas of conflict and weapons are being developed outside of any framework, creating new ways for humanity to kill each other and for humanity to destroy itself."


And no smart people, no financial or military “strongmen” can stop this process.

Yes, science is growing, but why on earth should we believe that if after the first fiasco: a revolution in Russia, -

scientific thought was not enough to correctly calculate the outcome of the war with the USSR, then after the second fiasco: the defeat of the West in the war with the USSR, civilizational science can suddenly calculate the outcome of the third world war, the emergence of the sprouts of a new civilization? There is NO reason to believe so.


So it is now: the birth of a new civilization will NEVER happen in a “scientifically correct” country!

Then why doesn't this happen in Arabia?

Especially after the founders of capitalism (the USA and Europe) began to interfere with the lives of everyone in the world with endless “sanctions”, which simply FORCED rapidly developing peoples to seek real INDEPENDENCE.


[1]                      СРАВНИТЕЛЬНОЕ ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЙ ХРЕСТОМАТИЯ. Б. С. Ерасов . 1998, 1999, 2001, ISBN 5-7567-0217-2



[2]              https://ria.ru/20230913/mir-1896192430.html








[4]                      https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/munich-security-conference-four-tasks-eu...



[5]                      https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/20082917



[6]                      https://ria.ru/20240207/sovbez-1926002681.html?in=l







Итоги голосований появятся после того, как проголосуете Вы.

Согласен ли я с выводом статьи ?

Моё мнение % мнений


Скорее "Нет"


Скорее "Да"


Народное мнение по каждой статье - ( % "Согласен" +% "Скорее согласен" ), - смотреть -> сюда

Понравилась ли мне сама статья ?

Моё мнение % мнений


Скорее "Нет"


Скорее "Да"


Статья мне в чём-то помогла

Моё мнение % мнений